Custom Search
Illegal Influence At Justice
A Justice Department report has concluded that politics illegally influenced the hiring of career prosecutors and immigration judges.

The report puts much of the blame on top aides to former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, especially the department's former White House liaison, Monica Goodling.

Goodling is reported to have violated federal law and Justice Department policy by discriminating against job applicants who weren't Republican or conservative loyalists.

Goodling acknowledged in May 2007 before the House Committee on the Judiciary that she "took political considerations into account in assessing candidates for career positions in the department," the report said.
   

July 28, 2008
 
The 140-page report does not say whether Goodling and others will face any charges. None of those involved in the discriminatory hiring still work at Justice.

The report ends a yearlong investigation by Justice's Office of Inspector General and Office of Professional Responsibility into whether Republican politics were driving hiring polices at the nation's premier law enforcement agency.

Goodling resigned her position in April 2007. Gonzales resigned in August 2007 after months of scrutiny and investigations into the hiring practices at Justice.

At the time, President George W. Bush blamed politics for Gonzales' predicament.

"Al Gonzales is a man of integrity, decency and principle," Bush said. "After months of unfair treatment that has created a harmful distraction at the Justice Department, Judge Gonzales decided to resign his position and I accept his decision. It's sad that we live in a time when a talented and honorable person like Alberto Gonzales is impeded from doing important work because his good name was dragged through the mud for political reasons."

The McCain campaign is playing fast and loose with the truth.
 

In a new attack ad, the McCain campaign claims that Barack Obama canceled a stop to visit wounded troops at a military base in Germany because he couldn't bring cameras inside.

That's not what happened. The Obama campaign scrapped the troop visit after the Pentagon told them it would be viewed as a campaign event. As MSNBC noted:

The plan was to go with his military aide, retired General Scott Gration. The Pentagon said Gration was off-limits because he had joined the campaign-- violating rules that it not be a political stop.

Obama had gone to see wounded troops in Iraq earlier in the week, without even confirming he'd been there. No press, no pictures. He has done the same when he goes to Walter Reed -- never any press.

Essentially, the Bush Administration intervened to block Obama's planned visit and now the McCain campaign is criticizing Obama for it. Isn't that ironic?

McCain's new ad claims that "McCain is always there for our troops." Except when he's not. McCain recently opposed (and then skipped the vote on) a 21st century GI Bill for our men and women in uniform. It wasn't an isolated incident.

"[McCain] has demonstrated a tendency to work against veterans' interests, voting time after time against funding and in favor of privatizing services--in other words, of rolling back the VA's improvements by supporting some of the same policies that wrecked Walter Reed," Brian Butler wrote in The Nation in June. As Butler notes:

During a March 2005 Senate budget debate, McCain voted to kill an amendment that would have "increase[d] veterans medical care by $2.8 billion in 2006." That amendment lacked an assured funding stream, but lest one mistake this incident for a maverick's stance against budget-busting, there's more. Just a year later McCain voted against an amendment that would have "increase[d] Veterans medical services funding by $1.5 billion in FY 2007 to be paid for by closing corporate tax loopholes.

McCain has displayed courage under fire, but he's no longer the champion for the troops he claims to be.